Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ELITE DESIGN LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ELITE DESIGN LLC in 439 ROUTE 17TH, CARLSTADT, NJ 07072 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 346599103.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Elite Design LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Elite Design LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ELITE DESIGN LLC
Site address
439 ROUTE 17TH
City
CARLSTADT
State
NJ
ZIP
07072
Mailing
439 ROUTE 17TH, CARLSTADT, NJ 07072
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.110 E04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,678 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.110(e)(4)(iii):LP gas container(s) installed on internal combustion engine vehicles were not securely mounted to prevent jarring loose, slipping or rotating:  a) Shop: Employees were operating a MITSUBISHI powered industrial truck were the LPG tank was not properly secure to prevent jarring loose, slipping or rotating. The LPG tank was not on the index pin, on or about 3/28/23.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2678

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,700 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(ii):29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii):  The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a power industrial truck:  a) Company: Employees were operating powered industrial truck without being trained, on or about 3/28/23.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3700
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.178 A05

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,678 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(a)(5):The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:  a) Mitsubishi Powered industrial truck: Forklift was equipped with a front-end attachment other than factory installed. The employer   did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered, on or about  3/28/23.  b)Toyota Powered industrial truck: Forklift was equipped with a front-end attachment other than factory installed. The employer   did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered, on or about  3/28/23.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2678

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.178(a)(4):Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:   a) Mitsubishi forklift: Employer allowed employees to operate a Mitsubishi forklift, with modifications and additions without prior manufacture's written approval, on or about 3/28/23.   b) Toyota forklift: Employer allowed employees to operate a Toyota forklift, with modifications and additions without prior manufacture's written approval, on or about  3/28/23.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346599103.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.