HUDSON, NH —
OSHA Inspection: CTM KING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CTM KING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION in 66 TERRANCE VIEW, HUDSON, NH 03051 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346607823.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CTM KING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
- Site address
- 66 TERRANCE VIEW
- City
- HUDSON
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03051
- Mailing
- 55 18TH STREET, LOWELL, MA 01850
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Nov 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 1c, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent October 11, 2023.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part: a. Jobsite- On or about March 23rd, 2023, the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to eliminate hazards at the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jul 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury: a. Jobsite - On or about March 23rd, 2023, a competent person did not inspect the fall protection equipment to ensure that the employees were utilizing the equipment properly prior to allowing the work to begin.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Jul 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2):The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii): a. Jobsite - On or about March 23, 2023, the employer's competent person did not train each employee: The nature of fall hazards in the work area; the correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling, and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used; and the installation, use and operation personal fall arrest systems, including anchorages.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. Jobsite - On or about March 23, 2023, employees were exposed to head injuries while working on the lower roof, where head protection was not provided or utilized to prevent the hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying objects while using a nail gun: a. Jobsite - On or about March 23, 2023, employees assigned roofing shingle installation while utilizing pneumatic nail guns were exposed to eye injuries, where eye protection was not provided or utilized to prevent the hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.150 C01 VI
- Issued
- Jul 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(vi):A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 10B, was not provided within 50 feet of wherever more than 5 gallons of flammable or combustible liquids or 5 pounds of flammable gas were being used on the jobsite: a. Jobsite - On or about March 23, 2023, the employer failed to provide fire extinguishers on the jobsite, where portable gas cans were in use.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a. Jobsite - On or about March 23, 2023, employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards of over 10 feet, where fall protection was not provided or utilized to prevent the hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a. Jobsite - On or about March 23, 2023, the extension ladder utilized for roof access was not adequately installed, in that the ladder did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346607823.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.