Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WILMAR CONTRACTING, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of WILMAR CONTRACTING, LLC in 2012 MILLER CUT OFF, LA PORTE, TX 77571 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 346617913.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Wilmar Contracting, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wilmar Contracting, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2012 MILLER CUT OFF
City
LA PORTE
State
TX
ZIP
77571
Mailing
102 BROAD STREET, CAMDEN, AL 36726
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2023
Abate by
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,572 · Current $3,572
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)  a) On or about April 06, 2023, a medical evaluation was not provided for employees required to wear Honeywell half-face respirators when torch cutting steel beams during demolition of a power plant.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3572

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2023
Abate by
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (Construction Reference 1926.103)  a) On or about April 06, 2023, a respirator fit test was not provided for employees required to wear Honeywell half-face respirators when torch cutting steel beams during demolition of a power plant.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.150 C01 VIII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2023
Abate by
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $5,358 · Current $5,358
29 CFR  1926.150(c)(1)(viii): Portable fire extinguishers were not inspected periodically in accordance with maintenance and use of portable fire extinguishers, N.F.P.A. No. 10A-1970:   a) On or about April 06, 2023, at the jobsite, where employees were exposed to fire hazards when torch cutting steel beams during demolition of a power plant without inspecting fire extinguishers for the following:  1.	Fire extinguishers with visible signs of corrosion were not taken out of service or hydrostatically tested.  2.	Fire extinguishers near the Airgas welding units were not fully charged.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5358

1926.850 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2023
Abate by
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $6,250
29 CFR  1926.850(a): Evidence in writing was not available that an engineering survey performed by a competent person had been performed prior to permitting employee(s) to start demolition operations:  a) On or about April 06, 2023, at the jobsite, employees were exposed to the hazard of structural collapse when torch cutting steel beams during demolition of a power plant without performing an engineering survey by a competent person prior to the start of demolition work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2023
Abate by
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,465 · Current $4,465
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement and maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:  a) On or about April 6, 2023, at the jobsite, a hazard communication program to include labeling, safety data sheets and employee training was not developed and implemented for employees performing demolition activities on a power plant.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4465

View Wilmar Contracting, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346617913.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.