Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROSENDO MORENO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROSENDO MORENO in 3213 KINGSGARDEN RD., DENTON, TX 76207 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346624372.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rosendo Moreno — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rosendo Moreno is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ROSENDO MORENO
Site address
3213 KINGSGARDEN RD.
City
DENTON
State
TX
ZIP
76207
Mailing
3611 CORTEZ DR., DALLAS, TX 75220
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2023
Abate by
May 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,679 · Current $1,607 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  On April 10, 2023, employees engaged in framing activities without fall protection were exposed to unprotected fall hazards of approximately 9 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1607.4
  • — Z (S) $2679

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2023
Abate by
May 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,009 · Current $1,205 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided.  On April 10, 2023, the employer did not provide an extension ladder where employees could access and egress the residential building upper levels, exposing them to potential fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1205.4
  • — Z (S) $2009

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $320 · Current $192 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.   On April 10, 2023, employees cutting and installing framing material work below other employees were not wearing hardhats and exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $192
  • — Z (O) $320

1926.416 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $320 · Current $192 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used.  On April 10, 2023, employees performing framing work utilized extension cords with the outer sheathing split exposing internal wiring. The employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $192
  • — Z (O) $320

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $320 · Current $192 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   On the residential construction site, the employer did not develop or provide fall protection training to the employees engaged in framing work on how to recognize and eliminate hazards such as fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $192
  • — Z (O) $320

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346624372.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.