MANCHESTER, NH —
OSHA Inspection: STAR ROOFING INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of STAR ROOFING INC. in 49 HALE ST, MANCHESTER, NH 03101 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346625668.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STAR ROOFING INC.
- Site address
- 49 HALE ST
- City
- MANCHESTER
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03101
- Mailing
- 15 STEVENS AVE, NASHUA, NH 03060
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No.1 Item No(s). 1 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 5, 2023.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 4a, 4b, 5a, 5b and Citation No. 2 Item 1 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 5, 2023.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Sep 14, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: On or about April 6, 2023, the employees were exposed to accidents involving eye and head injuries in addition to falls when the employer failed to maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 14, 2023
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, was not protected by protective helmets. On or about April 6, 2023, employees were exposed to injuries from falling objects while working under a ladder jack scaffolding.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 14, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents: On or about April 6, 2023, the employer did not ensure that eye protective equipment was used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.150 C01 VI
- Issued
- Sep 14, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,009 · Current $2,009
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(vi):A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 10B, shall be provided within 50 feet of wherever more than 5 gallons of flammable or combustible liquids or 5 pounds of flammable gas are being used on the jobsite. This requirement does not apply to the integral fuel tanks of motor vehicles. On or about April 6, 2023 A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 10B, was not provided within 50 feet as required.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2009
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Sep 14, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level. Location: 49 Hale St Manchester NH On or about April 6, 2023, employees were exposed to hazards associated with falls from scaffolding 10 feet or more above the lower level when the employer did not ensure the employees were wearing fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.452 K01
- Issued
- Sep 14, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1):Ladder jack scaffold platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet. On or about 4/6/2023 employees were exposed to falls over 20 feet when the employer did not ensure the ladder jack scaffolding did not exceed 20 feet in height.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 14, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):1926.1053(b)(1) Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Location: 49 Hale St Manchester NH On or about May 6, 2023, there were 2 instances where an extension ladder utilized for roof access was not adequately installed, in that the ladder did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof. Instance 1- Employees were exposed to fall hazards when an extension ladder utilized to access a ladder jack scaffolding did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface. Instance 2- Employees were exposed to fall hazards when an extension ladder utilized to access the roof did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Sep 14, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1):scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface shall be used. Cross Braces shall not be used as a means of access. On April 6, 2023 employees were exposed to hazards associated with falls when the employer did not provide a safe point of access to a platform that was more than 2 feet above the point of access. Employee were climbing over and around bracket and platform to access the work area.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 14, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $9,375 · Current $9,375
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Location: 49 Hale St Manchester NH On or about May 6, 2023, employees installing a roof on a new residential building were not protected from falls over 6 feet where fall protection was not being used. The Star Roofing was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard (name previously cited standard), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1489558, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 10/13/2023, with respect to a workplace located at the Epsom Traffic Circle in Epsom NH. 03234.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $9375
More inspections at Star Roofing INC.
View Star Roofing INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346625668.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.