Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PAINO ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS & BUILDERS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PAINO ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS & BUILDERS in 716 N MANTUA ST, KENT, OH 44240 (NAICS 541310). OSHA activity number 346633449.

Watch Paino Associates Architects & Builders — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Paino Associates Architects & Builders is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
716 N MANTUA ST
City
KENT
State
OH
ZIP
44240
Mailing
716 N MANTUA ST, KENT, OH 44240
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541310
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $388.00 · Current $388.00
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  The employer failed to provide documentation demonstrating the abatement methods and completion as cited in Citation 1 Items 1a/b/c for hazards associated with the lack of respirator program, medical evaluations, and fit testing for employees required to wear respiratory protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2009.00 · Current $1406.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.  On or about April 14, 2023, the employer failed to implement a written respiratory protection program where employees are required to wear half faced respirators while conducting dust generating tasks during demolition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1406.3
  • — Z (S) $2009

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.  On or about April 14, 2023, the employer failed to provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator for employees required to use half faced respirators while conducting dust generating tasks during demolition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.  On or about April 14, 2023, the employer failed to ensure employees using a tight-fitting respirator were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator for employees required to wear half faced respirators while performing  dust generating demolition tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346633449.