Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUZ GARCIA SEPULVEDA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUZ GARCIA SEPULVEDA in 5909 FLA BLVD, BATON ROUGE, LA 70812 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 346639297.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch LUZ Garcia Sepulveda — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for LUZ Garcia Sepulveda is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5909 FLA BLVD
City
BATON ROUGE
State
LA
ZIP
70812
Mailing
1126 JONQUIL DR, LONGVIEW, TX 75601
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $6,250
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.  On or about April 17, 2023, employees on the south side of the site worked under and adjacent to overhead material and tools without protective helmets.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6250

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $6,250
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.   On or about April 17, 2023, on the south side of the site, employees performed masonry work on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above the lower level without the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6250

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $6,250
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  On or about April 17, 2023, on the south side of the site, employees constructed a masonry wall while standing on the wall 6 feet or more above the lower level without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6250

1926.706 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $6,250
29 CFR  1926.706(a)(1): A limited access zone was not established prior to the start of the construction of a masonry wall.  On or about April 17, 2023, on the south side of the site, employees constructed a masonry wall that measured eighteen feet high, and 7-9 sections twenty-six feet long per section.  The sections of the wall ran east to west and north to south. Employees were working in areas that did not have a limited access zone protecting employees working in and around the cinder block wall.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6250

1926.706 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.706(b): Masonry walls over eight feet in height were not adequately braced to prevent overturning and to prevent collapse until permanent supporting elements of the structure were in place.  On or about April 17, 2023, on the south side of the site, employees constructed a masonry wall that measured eighteen feet high, and 7-9 sections twenty-six feet long per section.  The sections of the wall ran east to west and north to south. Employees were working in areas that did not have a limited access zone protecting employees. The cinder block wall was not adequately braced nor did it have permanent supporting elements to prevent overturning while employees were working around the unbraced cinder block wall.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2023
Abate by
May 30, 2023
Penalty
Initial $501 · Current $501
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record.  On or about April 17, 2023, on the south side of the site, employees constructed a masonry wall while standing on the wall 6 feet or more above the lower level without fall protection. The employer failed to provide a fall protection training record.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $501

View LUZ Garcia Sepulveda's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346639297.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.