Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J & C HENRIQUEZ SOLUTIONS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J & C HENRIQUEZ SOLUTIONS, LLC in 204 BROWN STREET, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 346648082.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J & C Henriquez Solutions, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J & C Henriquez Solutions, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
204 BROWN STREET
City
WEST HAVEN
State
CT
ZIP
06516
Mailing
17 HAYES STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06608
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $2,344 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b).  Worksite: On or about April 17, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employee who was working from the roof, installing gutters, at heights above 19 feet, was protected from falling.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2344
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $2,344 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  Worksite: On or about April 17, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employee who was required to gain access to the roof using an extension ladder at a height above 19 feet was equipped with a ladder that could be extended three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2344
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2023
Abate by
Jun 12, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $1,675 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: On or about April 17, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employee who was working from the roof, installing gutters, at heights above 19 feet, was trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1674.5
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2023
Abate by
Jun 12, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1060(a):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: On or about April 17, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employee who was required to use an extension ladder that was unable to be extended three feet above its landing surface, was trained in the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346648082.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.