Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LITZANIA GARCIA

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LITZANIA GARCIA in 2 BIRCH ROAD STE 105, MIDDLETON, MA 01949 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 346663859.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Litzania Garcia — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Litzania Garcia is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LITZANIA GARCIA
Site address
2 BIRCH ROAD STE 105
City
MIDDLETON
State
MA
ZIP
01949
Mailing
2 BIRCH ROAD STE 105, MIDDLETON, MA 01949
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2023
Abate by
Jan 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $2,009 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  Location - Shop Area: On or about 04/27/2023, a written respiratory protection program was not established for hazards associated with cutting granite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2009

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2023
Abate by
Jan 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  Location - production Area: On or about 04/27/2023, an evaluation and identification of respiratory hazards including but not limited too granite hazards was not performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2023
Abate by
Jan 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Location - Shop Area: On or about 04/27/2023, medical evaluations were not provided to employees required to don tightfitting elastomeric respirators while working with silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2023
Abate by
Jan 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  Location - Shop Area: On or about 04/27/2023, employees required to don tight fitting facepiece respirators were not provided fit tests.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 11 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2023
Abate by
Jan 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  Location - Shop area: On or about 04/27/2023, employees were not provided comprehensive and understandable respirator training  for required respirator use when working with silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 C09

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2023
Abate by
Oct 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $2,300 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.184(c)(9): Employee(s) were not kept clear of load(s) suspended, or about to be lifted by sling(s):  Location - Shop area: On or about On or about 1/10/2023, an employee unloading stone slabs for storage was under the suspended live load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2300
  • — Z (S) $4688

1910.178 A05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2023
Abate by
Jan 2, 2024
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(a)(5):The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:  Location - Storage Area: On or about 04/27/2023, the front-end attachment (jib) on PIT was not marked to identify the attachment for lifting material.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $200
  • — Z (O) $376

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346663859.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.