CYPRESS, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: EDER ORGANISTA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDER ORGANISTA in 18414 STARLIGHT VALLEY TRAIL, CYPRESS, TX 77433 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346665631.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EDER ORGANISTA
- Site address
- 18414 STARLIGHT VALLEY TRAIL
- City
- CYPRESS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77433
- Mailing
- 4911 RIDGEVAN STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77053
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. On or about April 28, 2023, an employee was exposed to flying particles while operating a pneumatic nail gun without eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3349
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 22, 2023
- Abate by
- May 26, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). On or about April 28, 2023, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of more than 6 feet while working on the roof without a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4688
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. On or about April 28, 2023, the employees were exposed to a fall hazard when accessing the southeastern roof with a ladder that was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3349
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 346665631.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.