Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CP ENERGY SERVICES

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CP ENERGY SERVICES in 2724 HARDWOOD RD., GONZALES, TX 78629 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 346666498.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch CP Energy Services — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CP Energy Services is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CP ENERGY SERVICES
Site address
2724 HARDWOOD RD.
City
GONZALES
State
TX
ZIP
78629
Mailing
6301 WATERFORD BOULEVARD STE. 110, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73118
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2023
Abate by
Nov 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,026 · Current $2,410 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.23(c)(8):29 CFR 1910.23(c)(8): The employer did not ensure that the cap (if equipped) and top step of a stepladder that are not used as steps.  On or about May 23, 2023, an employee was conducting maintenance on a Sand Commander auger, working from the top step of an A-frame aluminum ladder at heights approximately 8 feet, exposing the employee to fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2410.4
  • — Z (S) $6026

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2023
Abate by
Nov 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $8,036 · Current $3,214 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(1):The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment.  On or about April 28, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not conduct a hazard assessment for employees cleaning tanks, exposing employees to hazards such as, but not limited to; inhalation, dermal contact and eye irritation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3214.4
  • — Z (S) $8036

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2023
Abate by
Nov 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,046 · Current $4,018 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.146(c)(4):When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146.  On or about April 28, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees were entering tanks labeled as permit required confined space without implementing a permit required confined space program, exposing employees to hazards such as, but not limited to; inhalation, dermal contact, eye irritation, and asphyxiation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4018.4
  • — Z (S) $10046

1910.146 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2023
Abate by
Nov 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(g)(1):The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146:  On or about April 28, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees entered tanks labeled as permit required confined space without receiving training and understanding of procedures, exposing employees to hazards such as, but not limited to; inhalation, dermal contact, eye irritation, and asphyxiation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2023
Abate by
Nov 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,026 · Current $2,410 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.151(b):There was neither an infirmary, clinic, or hospital used for the treatment of all injured employees in near proximity to the workplace nor a person or persons adequately trained to render first aid:  On or about April 28, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees were not trained in First aid/CPR where an infirmary, hospital, nor clinic was within an appropriate distance to render first aid, exposing employees to further hazards due to a delay in medical treatment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2410.4
  • — Z (S) $6026

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2023
Abate by
Nov 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $8,036 · Current $3,214 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(a)(4):Modifications or additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:  On or about April 28, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees were working from a wooden pallet platform elevated by a rough terrain forklift up to approximately 8 feet high that was not designed by the manufacturer for such use, exposing employees to fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3214.4
  • — Z (S) $8036

1926.451 C02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 16, 2023
Abate by
Nov 9, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2)(iv):Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms without being specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use: Note:  Preamble to Subpart L promulgated new paragraph (c)(2)(iv) & (v) in final rule to provide guidance. Added provision requires that in the case of fork-lifts, the entire scaffold platform be secured to the forklift.    On or about April 28, 2023, and at times prior thereto, employees were working from a wooden pallet platform elevated by a rough terrain forklift up to approximately 8 feet high that was not designed by the manufacturer for such use, exposing employees to fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346666498.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.