Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE OF PRINCETON

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE OF PRINCETON in 800 BUNN DRIVE, PRINCETON, NJ 08540 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 346671035.

Watch Women'S Healthcare OF Princeton — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Women'S Healthcare OF Princeton is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
800 BUNN DRIVE
City
PRINCETON
State
NJ
ZIP
08540
Mailing
800 BUNN DRIVE, PRINCETON, NJ 08540
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621111
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2023
Abate by
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,465 · Current $3,349 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1030(f)(3): Following a report of an exposure incident, the employer did not make immediately available to the exposed employee a confidential medical evaluation and follow-up:  a) Facility: On or about 4/25/2023, the employer did not provide a confidential medical evaluation to an employee that was cut with a scalpel that had been used to perform a gynecological procedure on a patient.   NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3348.75
  • — Z (S) $4465

1910.1030 F03 III A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1030(f)(3)(iii)(A): The post-exposure evaluation and follow-up of an exposure incident did not include the collection of the exposed employee's blood as soon as feasible and test for HBV and HIV serological status after consent was obtained:  a) Facility: On or about 4/25/2023, An employee's blood was not tested immediately to determine HBV and HIV infectivity after an employee was cut by a scalpel that had been used on the source to perform a gynecological procedure on a patient.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 F03 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,465 · Current $3,349 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1030(f)(3)(ii)(A):The post-exposure evaluation and follow-up of an exposure incident did not include testing the source individual's blood as soon as feasible and after consent was obtained in order to determine HBV and HIV infectivity:  a) Facility: On or about 4/25/2023, A source individual's blood was not tested immediately to determine HBV and HIV infectivity after an employee was cut by a scalpel that had been used on the source to perform a gynecological procedure on a patient.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3348.75
  • — Z (S) $4465

1910.1030 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,465 · Current $3,349 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1030(g)(2)(i):The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program:  a) Facility: On or about 5/2/2023, the employer did not provide Bloodborne Pathogens training to employees with occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious material when performing duties including, but not limited to, assisting with procedures, such as, but not limited to biopsies, colposcopies and placements of IUDs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3348.75
  • — Z (S) $4465

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,465 · Current $3,349 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Facility: On or about 5/2/2023, the employer did not provide training to employees on chemicals used in the facility including, but not limited to, Hibiclens (a corrosive), Lidocaine Hydrochloride Injection, and Sodium Bicarbonate Injection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3348.75
  • — Z (S) $4465

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346671035.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.