Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALABAMA PLATING TECHNOLOGY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ALABAMA PLATING TECHNOLOGY, LLC in 3509 45TH ST SW, LANETT, AL 36863 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 346671837.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alabama Plating Technology, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alabama Plating Technology, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3509 45TH ST SW
City
LANETT
State
AL
ZIP
36863
Mailing
3509 45TH ST SW, LANETT, AL 36863
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
32
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2023
Abate by
Nov 3, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,586 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.22(d)(2): The employer did not ensure that hazardous conditions on walking-working surfaces are corrected or repaired before an employee uses the walking-working surface again. The employer did not ensure that if the correction or repair cannot be made immediately, the hazard is guarded to prevent employees from using the walking-working surface until the hazard is corrected or repaired.   a)  Line 1 catwalk shuttle cart crossing:   On or about May 2, 20123, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employee(s) to struck by hazards from not ensuring that the walking and working surface was guarded or protected  from moving shuttle carts.  b)  Line 1/Line 2  crossover entrance:   On or about May 2, 20123, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employee(s) to struck by hazards from not ensuring the walking and working surface was guarded or protected from moving shuttle carts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3586

1910.28 B11 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,586 · Current $1,793 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(11)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each flight of stairs having at least 3 treads and at least 4 risers is equipped with stair rail systems and handrails as described in 29 CFR 1910.28 Table D-2-Stairway Handrail Requirements.  a)  Line 1 catwalk access:   On or about May 2, 20123, and at times prior to the employer exposed employee(s) to fall hazards from not providing stair railing on stairs leading to entrance of line 1 catwalk access point with landing measured 53.5 inches to concrete floor, and had 4 treads and 5 risers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1793
  • — Z (S) $3586

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,586 · Current $3,586

Hazardous substances 0560

29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii):The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  a)Line 1 and 2 Loading Area:  On or about May 2, 2023, and at time prior to,  employee(s) were exposed to Carbon Monoxide up to 141 parts per million (ppm) during direct reading screenings while they were operating the Komatsu powered industrial truck and conducting work tasks at the Line 1 and Line 2-part loading and unloading stations and the employer failed to identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3586
  • — Z (S) $3586

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2023
Abate by
Oct 25, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1430

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a)	Main Plant and outside acid tank area:  On or about May 2, 2023, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards from required use of half mask silicon tight fitting respirators during job tasks of handling and working around hydrochloric acid without ensuring a medical evaluation was conducted for the respirator prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2023
Abate by
Oct 25, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1430

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a)	Main Plant and outside acid tank area:  On or about May 2, 2023, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards from required use of half mask silicon tight fitting respirators during job tasks of handling and working around hydrochloric acid without ensuring fit testing was conducted before initial use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2023
Abate by
Oct 25, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1430

29 CFR  1910.134(k)(3):Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  a)	Main Plant and outside acid tank area:  On or about May 2, 2023, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards from required use of half mask silicon tight fitting respirators during job tasks of handling and working around hydrochloric acid without ensuring training on the respirator was conducted prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2023
Abate by
Nov 3, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR  1910.1026(d)(1):The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):  a)	Maintenance area, Line 1 and Line 2 dip tanks: On or about May 5, 2023, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to hexavalent chromium Cr (VI) inhalation hazards from stainless-steel welding work tasks and work tasks around dip tanks that contain chromate plating solution and did not determine the employee's exposure through either the scheduled monitoring option or the performance-oriented option.  The employer is to make this determination in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2), the scheduled monitoring option, or paragraph (d)(3), the performance-oriented option.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Alabama Plating Technology, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346671837.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.