Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HENRY PINTO

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of HENRY PINTO in 3414 NOREEN DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43221 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346686223.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Henry Pinto — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Henry Pinto is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HENRY PINTO
Site address
3414 NOREEN DRIVE
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43221
Mailing
300 RIVERSIDE DR APT 116, COLUMBUS, OH 43220
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or about February 9, 2023, Henry Pinto located at 3414 Noreen Drive, Columbus, OH 43221: The employer did not initiate and maintain safety and health programs for employees  removing/installing roofing shingles, thereby exposing employees to the hazards  associated with performing roofing work such as but not limited to falls and struck-by.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2023
Abate by
Jun 1, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.   a. On or about February 9, 2023, Henry Pinto located at 3414 Noreen Drive, Columbus, OH 43221: The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to the work environment. Employees removing/installing roofing shingles were not provided training to recognize, control or eliminate hazards associated with, prior to performing roofing work. The following condition exposed employees to fall hazards between 7 and 19 feet and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2023
Abate by
May 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.   a. On or about February 9, 2023, Henry Pinto, LLC located at 3414 Noreen Drive, Columbus, OH 43221: The  employer did not ensure that roofers installing shingles using pneumatic nail guns wore eye protection thereby exposing them to struck-by hazards to the eyes.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 12, 2023
Abate by
May 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.   a. On or about February 9, 2023, Henry Pinto located at 3414 Noreen Drive, Columbus, OH 43221: The employer did not ensure employees engaged in residential construction activities six feet or more above lower level were protected from falls. Roofers were performing  re-roof activities at heights that varied from 7 to 19 feet without any form fall protection/prevention being used. The following condition exposed employees to falls of up to 19 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346686223.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.