CLINTON, MS —
OSHA Inspection: BRYAN E. PRESSON & ASSOCIATE
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BRYAN E. PRESSON & ASSOCIATE in 900 INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE, CLINTON, MS 39056 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 346692916.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRYAN E. PRESSON & ASSOCIATE
- Site address
- 900 INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE
- City
- CLINTON
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39056
- Mailing
- 900 INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE, CLINTON, MS 39056
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332312
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.28 B11 II
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2678.00 · Current $1607.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(11)(ii):the employer did not ensure that each flight of stairs having at least 3 treads and at least 4 risers is equipped with stair rail systems and handrails as described in 29 CFR 1910.28 Table D-2-Stairway Handrail Requirements. (a) Warehouse Area - On or about May 10, 2023, the employer did not provide standard handrails for the stairs exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1606.8
- — Z (S) $2678
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2678.00 · Current $1607.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Facility - On or about January 27, 2022, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear a 3M Half Facepiece respirator during painting, exposing employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1606.8
- — Z (S) $2678
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Facility - On or about May 10, 2023, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for the painter using a 3M half face piece respirator exposing the employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece was used, and at least annually thereafter: a) Facility - On or about May 10, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the painter was fit tested prior to using a 3M half face piece respirator exposing employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provided effective training to employees who are required to use respirators: Facility - On or about May 10, 2023, the employer did not provide respiratory training to the employee(s) required to use a 3m half face piece respirator exposing employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2678.00 · Current $1607.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a) Warehouse Area - On or about May 10, 2023, an extension cord connected to a fan had no strain relief exposing the employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1606.8
- — Z (S) $2678
1910.1200 F10
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(10): The employer did not ensure that workplace labels or other forms of warnings were prominently displayed on the container or readily available in the work area throughout each work shift: (a) Facility - On or about May 10, 2023, the employer did not label a tank containing diesel with the appropriate identity, exposing employees to chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332312)
WYOMING, MI—2026-07-16
R&M FABRICATION LLC
TRUSSVILLE, AL—2026-07-16
ALL SOUTH STEELWORX, LLC
NORTH BRANCH, MN—2026-07-15
111603 - BROWN HAWK LLC DBA NORTHERN LIGHTS STEEL FAB
VAN BUREN, AR—2026-07-14
MILLAR PARTNERS, LLC
CLANTON, AL—2026-07-14
C & S CANOPY, INC.
More inspections in MS
LAUREL, MS—2026-07-01
THERMO-KOOL
HORN LAKE, MS—2026-07-01
NEWLY WEDS FOODS, INC.
GAUTIER, MS—2026-07-01
DOUBLE R GAUTIER, LLC
OLIVE BRANCH, MS—2026-06-30
HYVE SOLUTIONS
GAUTIER, MS—2026-06-30
STEVE WILSON ENTERPRISE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346692916.