OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO'S CONSTRUCTION

Issued

Jun 23, 2023

Abate by

Jul 20, 2023

Penalty

Initial $2,009 · Current $2,009

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  (a) 8660 Alkie St., Arvada, CO 80005 on or about May 22, 2023 and times prior, the employer did not provide or require head protection for employees while working below an area where items, materials, or tools could fall and strike them..

Issued

Jun 23, 2023

Abate by

Jul 20, 2023

Penalty

Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    (a) 8660 Alkire St., Arvada, CO 80005 on or about May 22, 2023 and times prior employees were exposed to fall hazard in excess of 6 feet by not being tied off while performing roofing operations.

Issued

Jun 23, 2023

Abate by

Jul 20, 2023

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(2)(ii):The employer did not assure that each employee, as necessary, had been trained by a competent person in the correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used:  (a) 8660 Alkire St., Arvada, CO 80005 on or about May 22, 2023 and times prior employees were exposed to fall hazard by not being tied off while performing roofing operations. Fall protection was available, but not being used at the time of the inspection.

Issued

Jun 23, 2023

Abate by

Jul 13, 2023

Penalty

Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) 8660 Alkie St., Arvada, CO 80005 on or about May 22, 2023 and times prior employees were exposed to fall hazard in that the extension ladder used by employees, was not extended 3 feet above landing point on roof.