Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GREEN PRODUCT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GREEN PRODUCT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC in 188 SHEFFIELD ROAD, MONROEVILLE, AL 36461 (NAICS 331110). OSHA activity number 346720477.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Green Product Technologies, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Green Product Technologies, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
188 SHEFFIELD ROAD
City
MONROEVILLE
State
AL
ZIP
36461
Mailing
188 SHEFFIELD ROAD, MONROEVILLE, AL 36461
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331110
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C05 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2023
Abate by
Jul 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii): Lockout/Tagout devices shall be the only devices used for controlling energy, shall not be used for other purposes and meet the requirements of 1910.147(c)(5)(ii) [A] thru 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)[D]  a) At 188 Sheffield Road, Monroeville, AL. ; On or about May 22, 2023 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees in that the locks used for lockout/tagout were used for purposes other than intended and did not identify the employee who applied the lock.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2023
Abate by
Jul 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures in any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer:  a) At 188 Sheffield Road, Monroeville, AL. ; On or about May 22, 2023 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that respirators were required to be worn in the work place but the employer failed to establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2023
Abate by
Jul 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   a)  At 188 Sheffield Road, Monroeville, AL. ; On or about May 22, 2023 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that respirators were required to be worn in the work place but the employer failed to provide a medical evaluation before fit testing or use of respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2023
Abate by
Jul 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   a) At 188 Sheffield Road, Monroeville, AL. ; On or about May 22, 2023 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential respiratory hazards in that employees were required to wear a tight fitting half face negative pressure respirator without first being fit tested.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 G01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2023
Abate by
Jul 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i): The employer permitted respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face:   a)  At 188 Sheffield Road, Monroeville, AL. ; On or about May 22, 2023 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to potential respiratory hazards in that employees were allowed to have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the respirator facepiece and the face resulting inadequate seal.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2023
Abate by
Jul 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(2)(i):Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve.  a) At 188 Sheffield Road, Monroeville, AL. ; On or about May 22, 2023 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that respirators were required to be worn in the work place but the employer failed to provide provide storage to protect respirators from damage, contamination, dust, and moisture.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346720477.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.