Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COLBY A. MAILE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of COLBY A. MAILE in 5125 CAMERON LANE, MAPLETON, IL 61547 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346722259.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Colby a. Maile — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Colby a. Maile is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
COLBY A. MAILE
Site address
5125 CAMERON LANE
City
MAPLETON
State
IL
ZIP
61547
Mailing
1221 SOUTH 3RD STREET, PEKIN, IL 61554
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment was not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:  On or about May 23, 2023, an employee was using a pneumatic air gun to install roofing material and the employer had not ensured safety glasses were worn by the employee.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2023
Abate by
Jun 20, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):  Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure:  On or about May 23, 2023, employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 12 feet while installing roofing material on a residential roof and a suitable fall protection system was not used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346722259.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.