MAPLETON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: ARMIDA CHAPARRO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARMIDA CHAPARRO in 7802 W PFIEFER ROAD, MAPLETON, IL 61547 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346722499.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARMIDA CHAPARRO
- Site address
- 7802 W PFIEFER ROAD
- City
- MAPLETON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61547
- Mailing
- 2142 N LINN STREET, PEORIA, IL 61604
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 26, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: The employer did not submit certification that abatement is complete, including the date and method of abatement, for each citation that required it and was issued on July 06, 2023.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: On or about May 23, 2023, employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing construction activities and the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person: On or about May 23, 2023, employees were exposed fall hazards while performing construction activities including removing existing shingles because the employer did not ensure a competent person conducted frequent and regular inspections of the worksite and equipment to identify the workplace hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure: On or about, May 23, 2023, employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 10 feet while performing construction activities including removing existing shingles and a suitable fall protection system was not used.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: On or about May 23, 2023, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet while ascending and descending an extension ladder leaned up against the front of the house because the side rails did not extend at least three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346722499.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.