MILFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: C. LAZOS RENOVATION, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of C. LAZOS RENOVATION, LLC in 32 HEMLOCK DRIVE, MILFORD, CT 06461 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 346732951.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- C. LAZOS RENOVATION, LLC
- Site address
- 32 HEMLOCK DRIVE
- City
- MILFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06461
- Mailing
- 560 UNION AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2023
- Abate by
- Dec 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Worksite: Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01 Item 001 and Citation 01 Item 002 with a final order date of 08/07/23 was not received within 10 calendar days (by 08/19/23) following the abatement due date of 08/09/23.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $376
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 14, 2023
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $3,282 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: On or about May 26, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the residential roof, installing new roofing shingles, were provided with, and required to use fall protection. On or about May 26, 2023, an employee sustained injuries after falling approximately 12 feet from a residential roof.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3281.6
- · Z (S) $4688
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 14, 2023
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $2,344 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: On or about May 26, 2023, the employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the residential roof, installing new roofing shingles were trained in fall hazards and how to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2344.3
- · Z (S) $3349
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 346732951.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.