LONGMEADOW, MA —
OSHA Inspection: RMP HOME IMPROVEMENT EXPERT LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RMP HOME IMPROVEMENT EXPERT LLC in 95 ELLINGTON ST, LONGMEADOW, MA 01106 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346738362.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RMP HOME IMPROVEMENT EXPERT LLC
- Site address
- 95 ELLINGTON ST
- City
- LONGMEADOW
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01106
- Mailing
- 190 BEMIS AVE 2 ND FLOOR, CHICOPEE, MA 01013
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,683 · Current $1,842 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: 95 Ellington St., Longmeadow, MA: On or about May 31, 2023, the employees were observed roofing this residence using air powered nail guns and the employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1841.5
- — Z (S) $3683
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,683 · Current $1,842 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: 95 Ellington St., On or about May 31, 2023, employees were exposed to fall hazards are part of their assigned duties and the employer had not trained them prior to exposure to these hazards in topics such as but not limited to recognition of fall hazards, dangers of fall hazards and procedures each employee must take to prevent or minimize risk of such exposures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1841.5
- — Z (S) $3683
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training: 95 Ellington St., Longmeadow, MA: On or about May 31, 2023, the employer had not prepared a written certification record of fall protection training which included the name or other identity of the person trained, the signature of the person trained, date(s) the training was completed and the signature of the person who conducted the training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Jun 30, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $10,313 · Current $1,842 Reduced
General-duty citation text
1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: 95 Ellington St. Longmeadow, MA : On or about May 31, 2023; employees actively engaged in residential roofing activities were utilizing personal fall arrest systems and the attachment point had not been located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level. Employees were observed connected to the positioning rings on the front of the harness.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1841.5
- — Z (R) $10313
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346738362.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.