Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALGIMANTAS MIKALAUSKAS

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ALGIMANTAS MIKALAUSKAS in 12436 CEDAR RIDGE DR., HOMER GLEN, IL 60491 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 346773963.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Algimantas Mikalauskas — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Algimantas Mikalauskas is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
12436 CEDAR RIDGE DR.
City
HOMER GLEN
State
IL
ZIP
60491
Mailing
1290 DURHAM LANE, LEMONT, IL 60439
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2023
Abate by
Sep 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  a.  On or about June 14, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not maintain an accident prevention program to comply with the regulations of this part, which included, but were not limited to, employee protection when exposed to hazards associated with masonry construction operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2023
Abate by
Sep 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  a.  On or about June 14, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were not trained in the recognition of jobsite hazards, which included, but was not limited to, the hazards associated with masonry construction operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  a.  On or about June 14, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was using a STIHL TS 420 portable saw to cut masonry bricks that contained silica.  The employer did not implement engineering controls, such as using an integrated water delivery system to minimize dust exposure, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.1153 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2023
Abate by
Aug 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1153(d)(1):The employer did not ensure that employees were not exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 g/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA:  a.  On or about June 14, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee used a STIHL TS 420 portable saw to cut masonry bricks that contained respirable crystalline silica.  The employer did not ensure that employees were not exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 g/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA, thereby exposing employees to hazards associated with respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.1153 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2023
Abate by
Aug 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:  a.  On or about June 14, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer failed to implement a written exposure control plan that describes the measures used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Algimantas Mikalauskas's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346773963.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.