AUBURN, ME —
OSHA Inspection: CUSTOM CUT ROOFING & CARPENTRY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CUSTOM CUT ROOFING & CARPENTRY in 47 BROAD ST, AUBURN, ME 04210 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346787187.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CUSTOM CUT ROOFING & CARPENTRY
- Site address
- 47 BROAD ST
- City
- AUBURN
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04210
- Mailing
- 927 HOTEL ROAD, AUBURN, ME 04210
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $388
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer did not certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated. Establishment - The Employer did not certify abatement, in the following instances: a) Citation 1, Item 3
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $388
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: 47 Broad Street, Auburn - The employer did not ensure two employees were protected by protective helmets when working in areas where waste materials were dropped from the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: 47 Broad Street, Auburn - The employer did not ensure employees were protected from falling from heights of 20 feet while working on a low slope roof of less than 50 feet in width.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2023
- Abate by
- Jan 5, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. 47 Broad Street, Auburn - The employer did not ensure that employees received training on fall hazards prior to working at heights of 20 feet in height on a roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 3, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: 47 Broad Street, Auburn - A 24-foot ladder was fully extended and positioned to access the upper level landing surface of the roof. The ladder was not secured at its top, no grasping device was provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder, and the ladder was not able to extend 3 feet above the landing surface in order to allow employees safe access to the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346787187.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.