Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ADRIAN FLORES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ADRIAN FLORES in 1038 CARRIAGE DR, SUN PRAIRIE, WI 53590 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346795222.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Adrian Flores — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Adrian Flores is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ADRIAN FLORES
Site address
1038 CARRIAGE DR
City
SUN PRAIRIE
State
WI
ZIP
53590
Mailing
1223 ELM ST, BELOIT, WI 53511
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2023
Abate by
Dec 7, 2023
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $376
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  a)  The employer failed to submit documentation of abatement within 10 days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Item 3b. ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,009 · Current $2,009
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  On or about June 27, 2023, employees engaged in shingling activities on a steep slope residential roof were using a pneumatic nailing gun without eye or face protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2009

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On or about June 28, 2023, workers engaged in shingling activities on a high pitch residential roof at heights greater than 6ft were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about June 27, 2023, employees exposed to fall hazards were not trained on how to recognize and mitigate those fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  On or about June 26, 2023, workers were observed engaged in residential roofing using portable ladders extended less than 3ft above the upper landing surface to access and egress the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2023
Abate by
Aug 16, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  On or about June 27, 2023, the employer failed to provide each affected employee with ladder safety training. An individual was observed struggling to exit the upper landing surface due to the ladder not being extended 3ft above the door entry portico.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Adrian Flores's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346795222.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.