OSHA Inspection: SK NOVOTNY ENTERPRISES INC.

Issued

2023-08-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-09-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3572.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(e)(1): Cabinets, cutout boxes, fittings, boxes, and panelboard enclosures in damp or wet locations were not installed to prevent moisture or water from entering and accumulating within the enclosures:  On or about June 22, 2023: Employees engaged in cleaning activities at 111 Main Street, Louisville, Nebraska were exposed to electric shock hazards in that the employer failed to ensure the receptacles in damp locations were covered to prevent moisture or water from entering.

Issued

2023-08-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-09-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(iv): A receptacle installed in a wet or damp location was not suitable for the location:  On or about June 22, 2023: Employees engaged in cleaning activities at 111 Main Street, Louisville, Nebraska were exposed to electric shock hazards in that the employer failed to ensure that the receptacles in damp locations were protected from moisture or water.

Issued

2023-08-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-09-29 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  The employer was failing to protect employees from chemical hazards. This was most recently documented on or about June 27, 2023 at 111 Main Street, Louisville, Nebraska. The employer failed to develop a written hazard communication program for the chemicals used at the workplace, which included but were not limited to sanitizer and degreaser.

Issued

2023-08-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-09-29 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area:  The employer was failing to protect employees from chemical hazards. This was most recently documented on or about June 27, 2023 at 111 Main Street, Louisville, Nebraska. The employer failed to train employees on hazardous chemicals at the workplace, which included but were not limited to sanitizer and degreaser.