Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS MONTENEGRO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS MONTENEGRO in 4641 NOMAD DRIVE, MIDLOTHIAN, TX 76065 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346804156.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Montenegro — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Montenegro is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS MONTENEGRO
Site address
4641 NOMAD DRIVE
City
MIDLOTHIAN
State
TX
ZIP
76065
Mailing
8117 MORNING FOG CT, VENUS, TX 76084
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2023
Abate by
Jul 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  At the jobsite, employees operating  Hitachi nail guns while installing roofing shingles to the roof were not wearing eye protection, exposing the employees to the hazards of being struck by flying objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2679

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2023
Abate by
Jul 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest system.  At the jobsite, employees installing roofing material on the roof were wearing fall protection but were not tied off exposing the employees to an unprotected fall hazard at a height of over 6 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2023
Abate by
Jul 31, 2023
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $376
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.    At the jobsite, where employees performing roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards up to approximately 20 feet and did not verify by written certification that employees received training in recognition and avoidance to fall hazards at heights over 6 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.503 C03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2023
Abate by
Jul 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $376
29 CFR  1926.503(c): The employer did not retrain affected employees who already had been trained but demonstrated inadequate understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section:     Note:  Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where (1) Changes in the workplace render previous training obsolete; or (2) Changes in the types of fall protection systems or equipment to be used render previous training obsolete; or (3) When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee does not  have the understanding and skill required;   At the jobsite, where employees performing roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards up to approximately 20 feet and did not demonstrate hazard recognition and avoidance to fall hazards at heights over 6 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346804156.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.