GUILFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: GPD REMODELING LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GPD REMODELING LLC in 100 VILLAGE WALK, GUILFORD, CT 06437 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 346850340.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GPD REMODELING LLC
- Site address
- 100 VILLAGE WALK
- City
- GUILFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06437
- Mailing
- 3 HOPKINS DRIVE, NEW HAVEN, CT 06512
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2025
- Abate by
- Feb 10, 2025
- Penalty
- Initial $398 · Current $398
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 100 Village Walk, Guilford, Connecticut Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 01; Citation 001, Item 02; Citation 001, Item 03; Citation 001, Item 04; Citation 001, Item 05; Citation 002, Item 01; Citation 002, Item 02; Citation 002, Item 03 and Citation 002, Item 04 with a final order date of 8/12/2024 was not received within 10 calendar days (by 3/17/2024) following the abatement due date (3/27/2024).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $398
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11):Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toe boards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: 100 Village Walk, Guilford CT: On or about July 21, 2023, the employer did not ensure the workers exposed to an unprotected edge more than 19 feet above the lower level were protected from falling while performing tasks such as (but not limited to) roofing activities on a high slope roof.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $4839
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: 100 Village Walk, Guilford CT: On or about July 21, 2023, the employer did not ensure the workers exposed to an unprotected edge more than 19 feet above the lower level were trained in fall hazards before performing tasks such as (but not limited to) roofing activities on a high slope roof.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $4839
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: 100 Village Walk, Guilford CT: On or about July 21, 2023, the employer did not ensure the workers using fiberglass extension ladders set up the ladder to extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing, more than 19 feet above the lower level, while performing tasks such as (but not limited to) roofing activities.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $4839
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall: 100 Village Walk, Guilford CT: On or about July 21, 2023, the employer allowed the workers to ascended ladders while carrying a 62 pound bundle of shingles to an upper landing more than 19 feet above the lower level during tasks such as (but not limited to) roofing activities.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $4839
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. 100 Village Walk, Guilford CT: On or about July 21, 2023, the employer did not ensure the workers using fiberglass extension ladders used to access a roof, with an unprotected edge more than 19 feet above the lower level, were provided ladder training before performing tasks such as (but not limited to) roofing activities.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $4839
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $32,265 · Current $3,125 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11):Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toe boards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a) 100 Village Walk, Guilford CT: On or about July 24, 2023 the employer did not ensure the worker exposed to an unprotected edge at the upper roof more than 6 feet above the lower roof, were protected from falling while performing tasks such as (but not limited to) roofing activities on a high slope roof. b) 100 Village Walk, Guilford CT: On or about July 24, 2023 the employer did not ensure to the worker exposed to an unprotected edge at the lower roof more than 10 feet above the ground, were protected from falling while performing tasks such as (but not limited to) roofing activities on a high slope roof.
Recent events (3)
- — J (W) $3125
- — C (W) $32265
- — Z (W) $32265
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $32,265 · Current $3,125 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: 100 Village Walk, Guilford CT: On or about July 24, 2023 the employer did not ensure the workers exposed to an unprotected edge more than 10 feet above the lower level were were trained in fall hazards before performing tasks such as (but not limited to) roofing activities on a high slope roof.
Recent events (3)
- — J (W) $3125
- — C (W) $32265
- — Z (W) $32265
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $32,265 · Current $3,125 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) 100 Village Walk, Guilford CT: On or about July 24, 2023, the employer did not ensure the workers using fiberglass extension ladders set up the ladder to extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing, more than 6 feet above the lower roof, while performing tasks such as (but not limited to) roofing activities. b) 100 Village Walk, Guilford CT: On or about July 24, 2023, the employer did not ensure the workers using fiberglass extension ladders set up the ladder to extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing, more than 10 feet above the ground, while performing tasks such as (but not limited to) roofing activities.
Recent events (3)
- — J (W) $3125
- — C (W) $32265
- — Z (W) $32265
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $32,265 · Current $3,125 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. 100 Village Walk, Guilford CT: On or about July 24, 2023 the employer did not ensure the workers using fiberglass extension ladders were provided ladder training before performing tasks such as (but not limited to) roofing activities.
Recent events (3)
- — J (W) $3125
- — C (W) $32265
- — Z (W) $32265
More inspections at GPD Remodeling LLC
View GPD Remodeling LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346850340.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.