LITTLE ROCK, AR —
OSHA Inspection: ROSAS MASONRY, INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROSAS MASONRY, INC in 300 KANIS RIDGE DR, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72223 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 346858368.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROSAS MASONRY, INC
- Site address
- 300 KANIS RIDGE DR
- City
- LITTLE ROCK
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72223
- Mailing
- 179 FRANCIS ST., OPPELO, AR 72110
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01 I
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary: a) On or about July 26, 2023, on a scaffold at the southern side of the house, employees performing brick masonry activities from a scaffold which was not fully planked. b) On or about July 26, 2023, over the garage at the southern side of the house, employees performing brick masonry activities from a side bracket which was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access: On or about July 26, 2023, at the southern side of the house, employees were performing brick masonry activities such as but not limited to installing and cutting brick from a scaffold without a ladder or other safe means of access.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews: On or about July 26, 2023, at the southern side of the house, employees performing masonry activities such as but not limited to installing and cutting brick while working on a scaffold without guardrails installed on all sides.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: On or about July 26, 2023, at the southern side of the house, employees performing masonry activities such as but not limited to installing brick were on a scaffold where frames did not rest on base plates or adequate firm foundation in the following instances: a) A leg near the front door was on a mud sill but had no base plate. b) The leg for the other side of that frame was on a mud sill but had no base plate. c) A leg at the corner of the garage was on a mud sill but had no base plate. d) A leg by the garage on the roadside of the frame was not on a firm foundation and had sunk into the ground approximately 1-inch.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.451 C02 II
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units: On or about July 26, 2023, at the southern side of the house, employees performing masonry activities such as but not limited to installing brick were on a scaffold where frames did not rest on base plates or adequate firm foundation in the following instances: a) A leg by the garage had a base plate that rested on stacked lumber. b) A leg by the garage on the road side of the frame was on a mud sill that was too small for the base plate. c) A leg by the garage side of the frame at the corner of the building was on a foundation of stacked lumber and bricks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 H01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects. For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall: On or about July 26, 2023, at the southern side of the house, employees performing masonry activities such as but not limited to installing and cutting brick were working from a scaffold that was not equipped with toeboards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.1153 C01
- Issued
- Jan 22, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section: On or about July 26, 2023, employees performing masonry activities such as but not limited to installing and cutting brick were using a Husqvarna masonry saw without using an integrated water delivery system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3457
More inspections at Rosas Masonry, INC
View Rosas Masonry, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346858368.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.