GOSHEN, NY —
OSHA Inspection: AURORA INNOVATIONS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AURORA INNOVATIONS in 867 PULASKI HWY, GOSHEN, NY 10924 (NAICS 325314). OSHA activity number 346859663.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AURORA INNOVATIONS
- Site address
- 867 PULASKI HWY
- City
- GOSHEN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10924
- Mailing
- 867 PULASKI HWY, GOSHEN, NY 10924
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325314
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 22, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $7,340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In the workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or where respirators were required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures including the provisions (i)-(ix) of this section, as applicable: a) On or about August 30, 2023, at bagging production line, for the employees wearing a 3M Aura 9205+ N95 respirator while loading fertilizer. A line production employee was exposed to total dust at a time weighted average (TWA) of 39.18 mg/m3 while filling bags of soil, which is approximately 2.6 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for total dust of 15 mg/m3. The employer did not implement a worksite-specific respiratory protection program. b) On or about July 28, 2023, at facility, for the employees wearing 3M Aura 9205+ N95 respirator working around the area while employees are loading fertilizer. The employer did not implement a worksite-specific respiratory protection program. Abatement Note: The Respiratory Protection Program shall include the following sections: (1) Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace; (2) Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators; (3) Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators; (4) Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations; (5) Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators; (6) Procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators (if used); (7) Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations; (8) Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and (9) Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7339.8
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $7,340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) On or about August 30, 2023, at bagging production line, for the employees wearing a 3M Aura 9205+ N95 respirator while loading fertilizer. A line production employee was exposed to total dust at a time weighted average (TWA) of 39.18 mg/m3 while filling bags of soil, which is approximately 2.6 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for total dust of 15 mg/m3. The employees were not provided a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear the respirator. b) On or about July 28, 2023, at facility, for the employees wearing 3M Aura 9205+ N95 respirator working around the area while employees are loading fertilizer. The employees were not provided a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7339.8
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that employees using tight fitting face piece respirators pass an appropriate qualitative or quantitative fit test prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter. a) On or about August 30, 2023, at bagging production line, for the employees wearing a 3M Aura 9205+ N95 respirator while loading fertilizer. A line production employee was exposed to total dust at a time weighted average (TWA) of 39.18 mg/m3 while filling bags of soil, which is approximately 2.6 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for total dust of 15 mg/m3. The employees were not fit tested, either qualitatively or quantitatively, prior to being required to use this respirator by the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.1000 C
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 29, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $7,340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(c): An employee(s) was exposed to total dust in excess of the 8-hour time weighted average limits of 15 mg/m3 listed in Table Z-3: a) On or about August 30, 2023, at the facility's bagging production line, a line production employee was exposed to total dust at a time weighted average (TWA) of 39.18 mg/m3 while filling bags of soil which is approximately 2.6 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for total dust of 15 mg/m3. The exposure level is calculated from samples collected over a 390-minute period; the calculations include a zero value for the 90 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7339.8
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): a) On or about August 30, 2023 at the facility's bagging production line, a line production employee was exposed to total dust at a time weighted average of 39.18 mg/m3 while filling bags of soil, which is approximately 2.6 times the permissible exposure limit for total dust of 15 mg/m3. The exposure level was calculated based on samples collected over a 390-minute period; the calculations include a zero value for the 90 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 22, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $7,340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following: a) On or about August 30, 2023 at the facility, production and maintenance employees were exposed to soil blends and their components. Employer did not develop a hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7339.8
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 22, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) On or about August 30, 2023 at the facility, production and maintenance employees were exposed to soil blends and their components. Employer did not train employees on hazard communication.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.1200 G10
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(10): The employer did not ensure that, in all cases, the required information was provided for each hazardous chemical, and was readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): a) On or about August 30, 2023 at the facility, production and maintenance employees were exposed to soil blends and their components. Employer did not ensure all the required information for the hazardous chemicals were provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $11292
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325314)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346859663.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.