Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANIBAL RODRIGUEZ

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ANIBAL RODRIGUEZ in 44 OAKLAND AVE, METHUEN, MA 01844 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346900418.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Anibal Rodriguez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Anibal Rodriguez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANIBAL RODRIGUEZ
Site address
44 OAKLAND AVE
City
METHUEN
State
MA
ZIP
01844
Mailing
13 WOODBINE STREET, BROCKTON, MA 02301
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  Location: 44 Oakland Ave, Methuen, MA;  O or about 08/10/2023, a worker and the foreman were witnessed performing roofing activities on a residential roof 12-feet above a lower level without utilizing fall protection that was incorrectly erected on the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d): The employer allowed the use of body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system.  Location: 44 Oakland Ave, Methuen, MA;  O or about 08/10/2023, the worker and foreman were allowed to wear body belts as part of the personal fall arrest system which was erected on the roof of the residence.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds per employee attached.  Location: 44 Oakland Ave, Methuen, MA;  O or about 08/10/2023, the worker and foreman were witnessed utilizing a fall protection system anchorage which had only been secured to the roof with two fasteners per side (four total),  and was not installed per the manufacturer instructions to support at least 5,000lbs per employee attached.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346900418.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.