SHELTON, CT —
OSHA Inspection: H GODOY CONSTRUCTION LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of H GODOY CONSTRUCTION LLC in 484 BRIDGEPORT AVENUE, SHELTON, CT 06484 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346910201.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- H GODOY CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 484 BRIDGEPORT AVENUE
- City
- SHELTON
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06484
- Mailing
- 36 ORCHARD STREET APT 1, STAMFORD, CT 06902
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2023
- Abate by
- Dec 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $376 · Current $376
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Worksite: Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001 Item 001a, Citation 001 Item 001b, Citation 001 Item 002, Citation 001 Item 003a, and Citation 001 Item 003b with a final order date of 10/19/2023 was not received within 10 calendar days (by 11/02/2023) following the abatement due date 10/23/23.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $376
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
General-duty citation text
29 CFR1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Worksite: On or about August 15, 2023 the employer did not ensure employees who were exposed to fall hazards greater than 15 feet working on steep roofs were protected from fall hazards by use of fall protection equipment and systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: On or about August 15, 2023 the employer did not ensure that employees who were engaged in commercial roofing at heights above six feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,009 · Current $2,009
General-duty citation text
29 CFR1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder. Worksite: On or about August 15, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees who were ascending and descending a 24' extension ladder was used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2009
1926.1053 B08
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679
General-duty citation text
29 CFR1926.1053(b)(8): Ladders placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic, such as in passageways, doorways, or driveways, were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, nor was a barricade used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder. Worksite: On or about August 15, 2023 the employer did not ensure employees using a 24' extension ladder were barricaded from being struck by motor vehicles within a vehicle parking lot.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 23, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR1926.1060(a): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Worksite: On or about August 15, 2023 the employer did not ensure employees using a 24' extension ladder were trained to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346910201.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.