SALISBURY, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: PEDRO POJOY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PEDRO POJOY in 57 FERRY ROAD, SALISBURY, MA 01952 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346935380.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PEDRO POJOY
- Site address
- 57 FERRY ROAD
- City
- SALISBURY
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01952
- Mailing
- 2 CLAYTON AVENUE, METHUEN, MA 01844
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $2,344 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Location - Jobsite On or about 08/21/2023, employees were observed working at heights greater than 6 feet with no personal fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2344
- · Z (S) $4688
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $2,344 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) Location - Jobsite On or about 08/21/2023, employees were using a ladder that did not extend three feet above the roofs edge to gain access to the roof.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2344
- · Z (S) $4688
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 346935380.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.