CHICAGO, IL —
OSHA Inspection: JP1 CONSTRUCTION INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JP1 CONSTRUCTION INC. in 3105 S GILES AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60607 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 346936503.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JP1 CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 3105 S GILES AVE.
- City
- CHICAGO
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60607
- Mailing
- 14435 MILLARD AVE, MIDLOTHIAN, IL 60445
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $5,358 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): An employer may provide respirators at the request of employees or permit employees to use their own respirators, if the employer determines that such respirator use will not in itself create a hazard. If the employer determines that any voluntary respirator use is permissible, the employer shall provide the respirator users with the information contained in Appendix D to this section ("Information for Employees Using Respirators When Not Required Under the Standard") a. On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer allowed employees to use half mask tight fitting respirators during daily duties. The employer had not provided the employees using respirators with the information contained in "Appendix D" as required by this standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $5358
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer had not ensured that each employee required to wear Cordova NX952 N95 respirators had been provided with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were required to wear tight-fitting facepiece respirators. The employer did not ensure employees were provided with a fit test prior to the initial use of the respirator(s), thereby exposing employees to the hazards including, but not limited to, respirable silica dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii): a) On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were provided with and required to wear Cordova NX952 N95 respirators for exposure to materials including respirable silica dust. The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of the required training elements of the standard including, but not limited to, why respiratory protection is necessary, factors that compromise protection, proper fit, proper use, limitations and capabilities, change schedules, emergency use, inspection, maintenance and/or storage, general requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134, and how to recognize medical signs and symptoms.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,465 · Current $2,233 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: a) On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not maintain an accident prevention program to comply with the regulations of this part, which included, but were not limited to, employee protection when exposed to hazards related to commercial construction.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2233
- — Z (S) $4465
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: a) On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were not trained in the recognition of jobsite hazards, which included, but were not limited to, the hazards associated with commercial construction.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) On or about August 22, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing commercial masonry operations were not provided training on how to minimize fall hazards, thereby exposing the employees to hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 B07
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,465 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(7): On scaffolds where platforms were overlapped to create a long platform, the overlap did not occur only over supports, and/or was less than 12 inches (30 cm) when the platforms were not nailed together or otherwise restrained to prevent movement. On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing masonry operations from a mast climbing work platform, twenty-five (25) feet above the ground, were exposed to injuries from falls due to platform overlap not occurring only over supports and was less than 12 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4465
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,572 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. a) On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing masonry operations from a mast climbing work platform, twenty-five (25) feet above the ground, were exposed to injuries from falls while accessing the scaffold through windows more than 2 feet above the scaffold platform.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3572
1926.451 F04
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,465 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(4): Part(s) of a scaffold that were damaged or weakened, such that the scaffold's strength was less than that required by paragraph (a) of this section, were not immediately repaired, replaced, braced to meet those provisions, nor removed from service until repaired. a) On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing masonry operations from a mast climbing work platform, twenty-five (25) feet above the ground, were exposed to injuries from falls due to the installation of damaged scaffold planks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500
- — Z (S) $4465
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $4,375 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level. a) On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing masonry operations from a mast climbing work platform, twenty-five (25) feet above the ground, were exposed to injuries from falls due to the lack of guardrails.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4375
- — Z (S) $6250
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,465 · Current $3,127 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d): Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph (l) of 29 CFR 1910.178: 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a) On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not train and evaluate employees operating the JLG 1044C-54 Series II, Serial No. 0160015131.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3127
- — Z (S) $4465
1926.1052 C01
- Issued
- Dec 13, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $5,358 · Current $3,215 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail and one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: a) On or about August 23, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing masonry operations were exposed to fall hazards while using stairways that were not equipped with stairrail system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3215
- — Z (S) $5358
More inspections at JP1 Construction INC.
View JP1 Construction INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346936503.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.