Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. in 27 LILL AVE., NEWTON, MA 02465 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346945710.

Watch BT Construction Services, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BT Construction Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
27 LILL AVE.
City
NEWTON
State
MA
ZIP
02465
Mailing
12 UNION ST., UNIT B, MILFORD, MA 01757
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Jobsite: Employees, picking up roofing debris from the ground around the house, were not wearing head protection and exposed to tools and/or roofing debris falling on them.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $4688
  • — C (S) $4688
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3349.00 · Current $3349.00
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.   Jobsite: Employees, using pneumatic nail guns to affix asphalt shingles to the roof, were exposed to nails and/or roofing pieces from striking them in the eyes.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $3349
  • — C (S) $3349
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    Jobsite: Employees, reroofing the home, were exposed to falls of 8-ft to greater than 22-ft to the ground.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $4688
  • — C (S) $4688
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2009.00 · Current $2009.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   Jobsite: Employees, reroofing the home, were not trained in the recognition of fall hazards and the procedures to minimize or eliminate them.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $2009
  • — C (S) $2009
  • — Z (S) $2009

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.   Jobsite: Employees, accessing the roof via the aluminum extension ladder at the front of the house, were not trained in the recognition of ladder hazards and the procedures to minimize or eliminate them.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4688.00 · Current $4688.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:   Jobsite: The aluminum extension ladder, used by employees accessing the roof, did not extend 3-ft beyond the surface accessed exposing them to falls when mounting/dismounting the ladder.
Recent events (3)
  • — R (S) $4688
  • — C (S) $4688
  • — Z (S) $4688

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346945710.