Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: OSIEL MEDINA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of OSIEL MEDINA in 2712 CORNELL ST, LUBBOCK, TX 79415 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346949597.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Osiel Medina for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Osiel Medina is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
OSIEL MEDINA
Site address
2712 CORNELL ST
City
LUBBOCK
State
TX
ZIP
79415
Mailing
2712 CORNELL ST, LUBBOCK, TX 79415
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $1,707 · Current $1,707
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents:  On or about August 31, 2023 Employees engaged in roofing operations were exposed to struck by hazards while using pneumatic nail guns without the use of eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1707

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $1,707 · Current $1,707
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    On or about August 31, 2023Employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1707

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $1,707 · Current $1,707
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  On or about  August 31, 2023Employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet as the employer failed to ensure the rails of the ladder extended three feet above the edge of the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1707

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 346949597.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.