Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TUFCO LP

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TUFCO LP in 3161 S RIDGE ROAD, GREEN BAY, WI 54304 (NAICS 322291). OSHA activity number 346964083.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tufco LP — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tufco LP is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TUFCO LP
Site address
3161 S RIDGE ROAD
City
GREEN BAY
State
WI
ZIP
54304
Mailing
3161 S RIDGE ROAD, GREEN BAY, WI 54304
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322291
Employees
220
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2024
Abate by
Mar 6, 2024
Penalty
Initial $10,140 · Current $4,998 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer shall establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program shall be updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. The employer shall include in the program the following provisions of this section, as applicable:   At the establishment located at 3161 S Ridge Road, Green Bay, Wisconsin; at SB1 and SB2, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program where tight-fitting elastomeric respirators (3M 6503) were required to be worn by employees while performing tasks, such as but not limited to adding sodium bicarbonate to the process, exposing employees to the hazards associated with inadequate physical/physiological capability.  All provisions of 29 CFR 1910.134 (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(ix) must be contained in a written respiratory protection program and implemented, as applicable. Key elements include, but are not limited to the following: 1) Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators 2) Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations; 3) Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4998
  • — Z (S) $10140

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2024
Abate by
Mar 6, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.  a) At the establishment located at 3161 S Ridge Road, Green Bay, Wisconsin; at SB1 and SB2, the employer did not provide medical evaluations to determine each employee's ability to use half-face tight-fitting elastomeric respirators (3M 6503) that were worn by employees while performing tasks, such as but not limited to adding sodium bicarbonate to the process, exposing employees to the hazards associated with inadequate physical/physiological capability.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2024
Abate by
Mar 6, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k): This paragraph requires the employer to provide effective training to employees who are required to use respirators. The training must be comprehensive, understandable, and recur annually, and more often if necessary. This paragraph also requires the employer to provide the basic information on respirators in Appendix D of this section to employees who wear respirators when not required by this section or by the employer to do so.  At the establishment located at 3161 S Ridge Road, Green Bay, Wisconsin; at SB1 and SB2, the employer did not provide training to each employee that was required to wear a half-face tight-fitting elastomeric respirator (3M 6503) while performing tasks, such as but not limited to adding sodium bicarbonate to the process, exposing employees to the hazards associated with improper use of respirators.  All provisions of 29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1) through (k)(6) shall be provided to employees wearing respirators. Key elements include, but are not limited to the following: 1) Reason for respirators use 2) Respirator limitations and capabilities 3) Effective respirator inspection and use 4) Procedures for maintenance, care and storage of respirators 5) Recognition of signs/symptoms that may limit respirator use 6) The requirements of the respiratory protection standard
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(c)(2): If the workplace contains permit spaces, the employer shall inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces.  NOTE: A sign reading DANGER -- PERMIT-REQUIRED CONFINED SPACE, DO NOT ENTER or using other similar language would satisfy the requirement for a sign.  a) At the establishment located at 3161 S Ridge Road, Green Bay, Wisconsin; at SB1 and SB2, the employer did not ensure that exposed employees were informed of the existence and locations of and the danger posed by permit-required confined spaces, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means on permit-required confined spaces, such as but not limited to Tank A through Tank H, exposing employees to the hazards associated with permit required confined spaces, such as but not limited to engulfment, mechanical, and thermal hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Tufco LP's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346964083.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.