Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: 3M COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of 3M COMPANY in 801 N MARQUETTE ROAD, PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI 53821 (NAICS 327910). OSHA activity number 346967599.

Watch 3M Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 3M Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
3M COMPANY
Site address
801 N MARQUETTE ROAD
City
PRAIRIE DU CHIEN
State
WI
ZIP
53821
Mailing
801 N MARQUETTE ROAD, PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI 53821
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327910
Employees
540
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.120 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2023
Abate by
Apr 1, 2024
Penalty
Initial $12,278 · Current $12,278

Hazardous substances 1073

1910.120(q)(1)  Emergency response plan. An emergency response plan shall be developed and implemented to handle anticipated emergencies prior to the commencement of emergency response operations. The plan shall be in writing and available for inspection and copying by employees, their representatives and OSHA personnel. Employers who will evacuate their employees from the danger area when an emergency occurs, and who do not permit any of their employees to assist in handling the emergency, are exempt from the requirements of this paragraph if they provide an emergency action plan in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.38.  Alleged violation description is:   (1.)  On or about August 20, 2023, the emergency response plan was not implemented when employees responded to an isocyanate spill without personal protective equipment to protect from dermal absorption such as gloves and a chemical impervious suit.   (2.)  On or about August 20, 2023, the emergency response plan was not developed to include decontamination procedures when employees responded to an isocyanate spill.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $12278
  • — Z (S) $12278

1910.120 K02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2023
Abate by
Jan 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $12,278 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR  1910.120(k)(2)(i):A decontamination procedure was not developed, communicated to employees, or implemented before any equipment or employee entered areas on site where potential for exposure to hazardous materials existed:  On or about August 20, 2023, a decontamination procedure was not developed to communicate to employees before entering Building 49 Foam Room to clean up an isocyanate spill.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12278

1910.120 Q03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2023
Abate by
Apr 1, 2024
Penalty
Initial $12,278 · Current $12,278

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iv): Employees engaged in emergency response and exposed to hazardous substances presenting an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard, did not wear positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus until such time that the individual in charge of the incident command system determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection would not result in hazardous exposures to employees:  On or about August 30, 2023, two employees responded to an isocyanate spill without wearing a positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus. The employer had not identified employee exposures to isocyanate, nor made a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to isocyanate levels when employees were responding to an unexpected isocyanate spill.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $12278
  • — Z (S) $12278

1910.134 D01 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2023
Abate by
Jan 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii): When the employer was unable to identify or reasonably estimate the employee exposure, the employer did not consider the atmosphere to be IDLH:  On or about August 30, 2023, two employees responded to an isocyanate spill without wearing a positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus. The employer did not identified employee exposures to isocyanate, nor made a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to isocyanate levels when employees were responding to an unexpected isocyanate spill.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.120 Q06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2023
Abate by
Apr 1, 2024
Penalty
Initial $12,278 · Current $12,278

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR  1910.120(q)(6)(ii): First responders at the operational level did not receive at least eight hours of training or did not have sufficient experience to objectively demonstrate competency in the areas required by 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(ii)(A) through (q)(6)(ii)(F) and/or the employer did not so certify:  On or about August 30, 2023, two employees did not have operational level training or experience to clean-up and or contain an isocyanate spill in Building 49 Foam Room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $12278
  • — Z (S) $12278

1910.120 Q08 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2023
Abate by
Apr 1, 2024
Penalty
Initial $12,278 · Current $12,278

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR  1910.120(q)(8)(i):Employees who were trained in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6) did not receive annual refresher training of sufficient content and duration to maintain their competencies or did not demonstrate competency in those areas at least yearly:  On or about August 30, 2023, there was an isocyanate spill and the responding employees that were 24 hour certified per 1910.120(q)(6) did not have annual  refresher training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $12278
  • — Z (S) $12278

1910.1200 G08

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2023
Abate by
Jan 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $12,278 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1073

29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(8):  The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)  On or about Augusts 30, 2023, there was an isocyanate spill and the electronically stored safety data sheets were not readily accessible to employees responding to the isocyanate spill.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $12278

3M COMPANY

View 3M COMPANY's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346967599.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.