OSHA Inspection: TOYO INK AMERICA, LLC.

Issued

2023-10-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-11-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $8036.00 · Current $3214.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(ii): Flammable or combustible liquids were not stored in tanks or closed containers.  On or about September 13, 2023, and at times prior thereto, flammable liquids were stored in open containers in the following locations, exposing the employees to the hazard of an explosion or fire.  a.) In the "Water" side of the ink production area, there was one (1) open container of Multiwet MM-80-LQ - (AP). b.) In the "Solvent" side of the ink production area, there were two (2) open containers of flammable mixtures of solvent products.  c.) In the Laboratory area, there were two (2) open containers of flammable mixtures of product ingredients.

Issued

2023-10-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-11-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $8036.00 · Current $3214.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(ii)(b)(2): The quantity of Category 2, 3 or 4 flammable liquids located outside of an inside storage room or storage cabinet in a building or in any one fire area of a building exceeded 120 gallons:  On or about September 13, 2023, and at times prior thereto, approximately 440 gallons of Category 2, 3, or 4 flammable liquids were located within the ink production area outside of an inside storage room, exposing employees to flammable hazards.

Issued

2023-10-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-11-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $8036.00 · Current $3214.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.106(e)(9)(iii): Combustible waste material and residues in a building or unit operating area were not kept to a minimum, stored in covered metal receptacles and disposed of daily:  On or about September 13, 2023, and at times prior thereto, rags soaked in flammable and combustible substances were stored in open metal drums in the solvent side of the ink production area, exposing employees to the hazard of an explosion or fire.

Issued

2023-10-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-11-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $10046.00 · Current $4018.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions.   On or about September 13, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not require appropriate hand protection in the production areas when working with hazardous chemical substances, exposing employees to chemical hazards.

Issued

2023-10-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-11-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $8036.00 · Current $3214.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.141(g)(2): Employees were permitted to consume food or beverage in area(s) exposed to toxic materials:  On or about September 13, 2023, and at times prior thereto, an orange Igloo drink dispenser filled with Gatorade was provided for employees in the solvent side of the ink production area, exposing employees to toxic materials.

Issued

2023-10-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-11-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $12055.00 · Current $4822.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(10): The employer did not ensure that workplace labels or other forms of warnings were legible, in English and prominently displayed on the container or readily available in the work area throughout each work shift.   On or about September 13, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that workplace labels were displayed on containers in the warehouse, ink, and polymer production areas, exposing employees to various chemical hazards.

Issued

2023-10-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-11-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $6026.00 · Current $2410.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(4)(ii): The laboratory employee was not trained on the applicable details of the employer's written Chemical Hygiene Plan.  On or about September 13, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that all laboratory employees were trained on the details of the employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan, exposing employees to chemical hazards.

Issued

2023-10-30 00:00:00

Abate by

2023-11-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(4): The employer did not review and evaluate the effectiveness of the Chemical Hygiene Plan at least annually and update it as necessary.   On or about September 13, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not review and evaluate the effectiveness of the Chemical Hygiene Plan annually, exposing employees to various chemical hazards.

Issued

2023-10-30 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   On or about June 27, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that employees wearing a tightfitting elastomeric respirator had undergone a medical evaluation, exposing employees to physical hazards.

Issued

2023-10-30 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about June 27, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that employees wearing a tightfitting elastomeric respirator had undergone fit testing, exposing employees to respiratory hazards.