LEXINGTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: PROBUILDERS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of PROBUILDERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 8 MUSTER LN., LEXINGTON, MA 02420 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346992787.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PROBUILDERS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 8 MUSTER LN.
- City
- LEXINGTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02420
- Mailing
- 110 WINFIELD ST APT2, WORCESTER, MA 01602
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 17
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $5,358 · Current $5,358
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. Jobsite: Employees, operating pneumatic nail guns and exposed to flying objects, were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5358
- — C (S) $5358
- — Z (S) $5358
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: Jobsite: Employees, walking working on the ground around the home, were not wearing head protection.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $6,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: Employees, engaged in reroofing work on the roof of the home, were not protected from falls of 9-feet or more to the ground.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6250
- — C (S) $6250
- — Z (S) $6250
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not independent of any anchorage being used to support or suspend platforms and/or were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached. Jobsite: The Personal Fall Arrest System (PFAS) anchorage points, installed on the roof for employee use, were not capable of supporting 5000lbs.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: Jobsite: The attachment point, of the vertical lifeline to the employees' harness, was not located at the employees back
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.552 A01
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2024
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $6,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with the manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators. Jobsite driveway: The RGC Pro 200 material hoist, used by employees to gain access to the roof peak, at a height of approximately 16 feet above the ground, was not designed to be used in such a manner.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6250
- — C (S) $6250
- — Z (S) $6250
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 3, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $6,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Jobsite rear of house: The siderails of the ladders, used by employees to access the roof of the home, did not extend 3-feet beyond the roof surface and were not secured.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6250
- — C (S) $6250
- — Z (S) $6250
More inspections at Probuilders Construction, INC.
View Probuilders Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346992787.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.