MIDLAND, TX —
OSHA Inspection: CORCOAT I, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CORCOAT I, LLC in 2211 COMMERCE DR, MIDLAND, TX 79703 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 347005944.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CORCOAT I, LLC
- Site address
- 2211 COMMERCE DR
- City
- MIDLAND
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79703
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 8486, MIDLAND, TX 79708
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 E02 II
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $1,659 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(ii): Flammable or combustible liquids were not stored in tanks or closed containers: On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to fire hazards when using flammable paints that were not being stored in a tank or closed container.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1659
- — Z (S) $2765
1910.107 E02
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2): The quantity of flammable liquids or liquids with a flashpoint greater than 199.4 degrees F (93 degrees C) kept in the vicinity of spraying operations were not a minimum required for operations or they exceeded a supply for one day or one shift: On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to fire hazards when using flammable paints that were being stored in the vicinity of the spraying operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 C05
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $1,659 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(5): Electrical equipment not approved for locations containing both deposits of readily ignitable residues and explosive vapors was present in spraying area(s): On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to fire hazards when using electrical equipment, not approved for locations containing both deposits of readily ignitable residues and explosive vapors, in the spray area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1659
- — Z (S) $2765
1910.107 G02
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $1,659 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary: On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to fire hazards due to the spraying area not being kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1659
- — Z (S) $2765
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $1,244 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):The employer did not identify a document as a certification of hazard assessment: On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to chemical hazards, when using products such as but not limited to Epoxy Catalyst, due to the employer not verifying that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1244.4
- — Z (S) $2074
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $1,244 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to chemical hazards, when using products such as but not limited to Epoxy Catalyst, due to the employer not implementing a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1244.4
- — Z (S) $2074
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to chemical hazards, when using elastomeric respirators with having been provided a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to chemical hazards, when using products such as but not limited to Epoxy Catalyst, due to the employer not ensuring that employees passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to chemical hazards, when using products such as but not limited to Epoxy Catalyst, due to the employer not providing training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,074 · Current $1,244 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to chemical hazards, when using products such as but not limited to Epoxy Catalyst, due to the employer not developing and implementing a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1244.4
- — Z (S) $2074
1910.1200 H03
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv): On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to chemical hazards, when using products such as but not limited to Epoxy Catalyst, due to the employer not training employees on a hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 G07
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7): "NO SMOKING" sign(s) in large letters on contrasting color backgrounds were not conspicuously posted at spraying area(s) and paint storage room(s): On or about October 2, 2023, employees performing pipe cleaning operations were exposed to fire hazards due to a lack of "NO SMOKING" in large letters on contrasting color backgrounds being conspicuously posted at the spraying area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347005944.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.