Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of CK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. in 850 JAEGER STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43206 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 347013435.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch CK Construction Group, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CK Construction Group, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
850 JAEGER STREET
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43206
Mailing
6245 WESTERVILLE ROAD, WESTERVILLE, OH 43081
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2024
Abate by
May 8, 2025
Penalty
Initial $14,518 · Current $14,518
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:  On or about October 4, 2023, during the construction of a mixed-use (commercial/residential) building, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from falling loads, while offloading building materials with the use of a tower crane. The employer had developed site specific work rules for compliance with this standard for the shared use of the tower crane by subcontractors and their subcontractors, but the fall zone was not effectively barricaded or otherwise cordoned off or other measures taken to prevent workers from working in the hoisting fall zone during hoisting activities in accordance with the developed plan.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $14518
  • — C (S) $14518
  • — Z (S) $14518

1926.1425 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2024
Abate by
Mar 7, 2024
Penalty
Initial $14,518 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1425(a): The employer did not use available hoisting routes to minimize the exposure of employees to hoisted loads.   a. CK Construction Group, Inc. dba Corna Kokosing Construction Company located at 860 Jaeger Street, Columbus, OH 43206: On or about October 4, 2023,  during the construction of a mixed-use (commercial/residential) building, the employer did not ensure available hoisting routes which minimized the exposure of employees to overhead loads were utilized. With the use of a tower crane, bundles of OSB sheathing were being offloaded from delivery trucks to the second deck of the structure.  The hoisting routes did not minimize exposure to employees who were utilizing a ladder and standing at ground level within the fall zone as the loads were being repeatedly lifted from the trucks to the second deck. The following condition exposed employees to struck-by hazards from the overhead loads and a subsequent felled load event.   b. CK Construction Group, Inc. dba Corna Kokosing Construction Company located at 860 Jaeger Street, Columbus, OH 43206: On or about October 4, 2023, during the construction of a mixed-use (commercial/residential) building, the controlling employer did not ensure available hoisting routes which minimized the exposure of sub-contractor employees to overhead loads were utilized. With the use of a tower crane, bundles of OSB sheathing were being offloaded from delivery trucks to the second deck of the structure.  The hoisting routes did not minimize exposure to sub-contractor employees who were working at ground level within the fall zone as the loads were being repeatedly lifted from the trucks to the second deck. The following condition exposed sub-contractor employees to struck-by hazards from the overhead loads and a subsequent felled load event.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $14518
  • — Z (S) $14518

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347013435.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.