WATERBURY, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MH1 CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MH1 CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 586 PLANK ROAD, WATERBURY, CT 06705 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347023434.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MH1 CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 586 PLANK ROAD
- City
- WATERBURY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06705
- Mailing
- 196 1/2 SYLVAN AVENUE, WATERBURY, CT 06706
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 12, 2024
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $388
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 586 Plank Road, Waterbury, Connecticut Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 1b; Citation 002, Item 01 and Citation 002, Item 02 with a final order date of 7/17/2024 was not received within 10 calendar days (by 12/16/2024) following the abatement due date (12/6/2024).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $388
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder. Jobsite: On or about October 10, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees using a 28-foot aluminum extension ladder at a height of approximately 14 feet, 2 inches from ground level to the roof deck, had the base of the ladder approximately one-quarter of the working length.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $2679
- — C (S) $2679
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.1060 A01 III
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and/or stairways given by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling the ladders and/or stairways. Jobsite: On or about October 10, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees using a 28-foot aluminum extension ladder to access a roof approximately 14 feet, 2 inches from ground level, were trained to recognize the hazards associated with ladder use and procedures to follow to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $31,252 · Current $31,252
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were replacing asphalt shingles on a steep-pitch commercial roof at a height of approximately 16 feet, 6 inches were protected from fall hazards by the use of fall protection systems.
Recent events (3)
- — J (W) $31252
- — C (W) $31252
- — Z (W) $31252
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2023
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $31,252 · Current $31,252
General-duty citation text
29 CFR1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: On or about October 10, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees who were engaged in commercial roofing on a step-pitched roof a height of approximately 16 feet, 6 inches from ground level, were trained in the recognition of fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — J (W) $31252
- — C (W) $31252
- — Z (W) $31252
More inspections at MH1 Construction, LLC
View MH1 Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347023434.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.