OSHA Inspection: 13 CONSTRUCTION & PRO SERVICES LLC

Issued

Mar 21, 2024

Abate by

May 2, 2024

Penalty

Initial $5,323 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Such programs did not provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.  The employer did not ensure a competent person conducts an adequate inspection of the job site, materials, and equipment. The condition was most recently observed on or about October 18, 2023, when three employees were observed working at 1206 Grand Canyon Drive in Wentzville, Missouri. During the inspection, employees were exposed to the following hazardous conditions:  a) The employer did not ensure employees were using eye protection while exposed to flying particles or struck-by hazards. b) The employer did not ensure the employees exposed to fall hazards were utilizing guardrail systems, a safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system.

Issued

Mar 21, 2024

Penalty

Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  The employer did not ensure employees were protected from eye hazards from flying particles. The condition was most recently observed on or about October 18, 2023, when three employees were observed working on a one-story single-family home at 1206 Grand Canyon Drive in Saint Charles, Missouri. The employer did not ensure two employees utilizing pneumatic nail guns were provided and used appropriate eye protection while exposed to struck-by hazards.

Issued

Mar 21, 2024

Penalty

Initial $5,323 · Current $0 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   13 Construction & Pro Services LLC:  The employer did not ensure employees were protected from elevated fall hazards. The condition was most recently observed on or about 18 October 2023, when three employees were observed roofing a residential building at 1206 Grand Canyon Drive in Wentzville, Missouri. The employer did not utilize guardrail systems, a safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system. Three employees were observed working on the roof of the building, at heights of approximately 15-20 feet and greater above the ground, without fall protection and thus were exposed to fall hazards.