Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HECTOR HUERTA-JUAREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HECTOR HUERTA-JUAREZ in 8601 BREWER W. REISINGER ROAD, FORT WORTH, TX 76123 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 347049215.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hector Huerta-Juarez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hector Huerta-Juarez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8601 BREWER W. REISINGER ROAD
City
FORT WORTH
State
TX
ZIP
76123
Mailing
2144 GLENHAVEN DRIVE, LEWISVILLE, TX 75067
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $1,707 · Current $1,024 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  On or about October 19, 2023 and at times prior thereto, employees performing masonry work of a new commercial building were exposed to head injuries where overhead hazards exist were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1024.2
  • — Z (S) $1707

1926.300 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $1,707 · Current $1,024 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use:   On or about October 19, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure grinders with a cutting blade were used with a guard installed exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1024.2
  • — Z (S) $1707

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,846 · Current $1,708 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    On or about October 19, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure scaffolds from were masonry employees worked were equipped with guardrails or fall protection. An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1707.6
  • — Z (S) $2846

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  On or about October 19, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure scaffolds from where a masonry employee worked was fully planked. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,277 · Current $1,366 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Cross braces were used as a means of access.  On or about October 19, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure employees working from a two-tier scaffold platform was provided with a ladder to access and egress the scaffold. Anemployee was exposed to a fall hazard up to 12 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1366.2
  • — Z (S) $2277

1926.451 F03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  On or about October 19, 2023, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure scaffolds from where masonry employee(s) worked were safe for use:  a) a two-tier scaffold system was not fully assembled exposing employee(s) to fall hazards, b) the scaffold systems were not fully planked exposing employee(s) to fall hazards ,  c) the scaffold systems were not equipped with guard rails exposing employee(s) to fall hazards , d) the scaffold system did not have a ladder for safe access and egress exposing employee(s) to fall hazards, d) the scaffold system did not have falling object  protection exposing employee(s) to struck-by hazards .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347049215.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.