HUDSON, NH —
OSHA Inspection: ONE PRESTIGE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ONE PRESTIGE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP. in 30 HURLEY ST., HUDSON, NH 03051 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347053167.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ONE PRESTIGE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CORP.
- Site address
- 30 HURLEY ST.
- City
- HUDSON
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03051
- Mailing
- 813 MAIN ST., HAVERHILL, MA 01830
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3349.00 · Current $1675.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. Jobsite - On or about October 23, 2023, a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to falls, eye injuries, and electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1674.5
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s). Jobsite - On or about October 23, 2023, the employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to falls, eye injuries, and electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. Jobsite - On or about October 23, 2023, the employer did not provide training to employees for recognizing and avoiding unsafe conditions prior to allowing them to work at the site where employees were exposed to eye injuries and electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Jobsite - On or about October 23, 2023, the employer did not provide training to each employee exposed to falls of over 10 feet from the roof of the building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3349.00 · Current $1675.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors or potentially injurious light radiation. Jobsite - On or about October 23, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees using pneumatic nail guns were protected from flying particles and debris, where eye protection was not worn.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1674.5
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3349.00 · Current $1675.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): The employer permitted employees to work in close proximity to energized, unguarded, and ungrounded electric power circuits that the employee could contact in the course of their work. Jobsite - On or about October 23, 2023, the employer allowed and an employee to work in close proximity to the energized and unguarded power drop to the house. The employee was observed working around the base of the conduit entering the roof of the home, within approximately one foot of the energized and unguarded power line.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1674.5
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4688.00 · Current $2344.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). Jobsite - On or about October 23, 2023, employees installing shingles on the roof of the home were not protected from a fall of over 10 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2344
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.552 A01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3349.00 · Current $1675.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators. Jobsite - On or about October 23, 2023, the employer did not ensure employees were following the manufacturer's specifications and limitations while using a RGC material hoist by allowing the employees to use the hoist as a ladder to access the roof, in disregard of the manufacturer's instruction to not do so, exposing them to falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1674.5
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3349.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. Jobsite - On or about October 23, 2023, the side rails on the extension ladder set up to access the roof did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface, exposing employees to a fall.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3349
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in NH
CONCORD, NH—2026-07-10
C.C. TOMATOES
FRANCESTOWN, NH—2026-07-10
JM BUILDERS LLC
FRANCESTOWN, NH—2026-07-10
D&D INSULATION, LLC
NORTHFIELD, NH—2026-07-03
JP PEST SERVICES
CONCORD, NH—2026-07-01
REYES CARPENTRY, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347053167.