OSHA Inspection: JTONY'S CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

Issued

Mar 22, 2024

Abate by

Apr 26, 2024

Penalty

Initial $388 · Current $388

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No.1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 2, 4, 5a & 5b nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent February 26, 2024.

Issued

Mar 22, 2024

Abate by

Apr 26, 2024

Penalty

Initial $388 · Current $388

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 3 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent February 26, 2024.

Issued

Jan 5, 2024

Abate by

Feb 23, 2024

Penalty

Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  Site- Employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program.

Issued

Jan 5, 2024

Abate by

Feb 23, 2024

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)   Site- Employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide inspections of the worksite conducted by a competent person.

Issued

Jan 5, 2024

Abate by

Jan 11, 2024

Penalty

Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where the employer did not require employees to wear eye protection.

Issued

Jan 5, 2024

Abate by

Jan 11, 2024

Penalty

Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    Site- Employees working from the roof were exposed to a fall of approximately 20 feet where fall protection was not utilized.

Issued

Jan 5, 2024

Abate by

Feb 23, 2024

Penalty

Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.

Issued

Jan 5, 2024

Abate by

Jan 11, 2024

Penalty

Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:   Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where a RCG material hoist was used as a ladder.

Issued

Jan 5, 2024

Abate by

Jan 11, 2024

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.     Site- Employees using an extension ladder to access the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the top of the ladder was less than two rungs above the landing surface.