LONG BEACH, MS —
OSHA Inspection: Q-1 CONTRACTING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of Q-1 CONTRACTING, INC. in 2012 W. 2ND ST., LONG BEACH, MS 39560 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 347065138.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- Q-1 CONTRACTING, INC.
- Site address
- 2012 W. 2ND ST.
- City
- LONG BEACH
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39560
- Mailing
- 6228 MARY KITCHENS RD., MILTON, FL 32583
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $1,876 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): (a) Building 13 - On or about October 24, 2023, the employer instructed the all-terrain forklift operator(s) to use the lifts to lift personnel up in man basket to work on the face of the buildings without being properly trained. (b) Building 20 - On or about October 24, 2023, the employer instructed the all-terrain forklift operator(s) to use the lifts to lift personnel up in man basket to work on the face of the buildings without being properly trained.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1876.2
- — C (S) $4688
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $1,876 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: (a) Building 13 - On or about October 24, 2023, the employer instructed his employees to work from the man basket with the front guard railing removed, lifted in the air, without the protection of a fall restraint system exposing employee(s) to fall hazards. (b) Building 20 - On or about October 24, 2023, the employer instructed his employees to work from the man basket with the front guard railing removed, lifted in the air, without the protection of a fall restraint system exposing employee(s) to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1876.2
- — C (S) $4688
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.453 B02 VIII
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $1,876 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(viii): An aerial lift truck was moved when the boom was elevated in a working position with men in the basket and was not specifically designed for this type of operation in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section. (a) Building 13 - On or about October 24, 2023, the employer instructed two employees to enter into the man basket that was full of construction debris, lifted the basket and drove to the trash dumpster, tilted the forks forward to empty the debris into the trash bin, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1876.2
- — C (S) $4688
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $1,876 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Building 13 - On or about October 24, 2023, the employer failed to ensure the employee working from the roof removing siding was protected from falling with the use of a fall protection system exposing employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1876.2
- — C (S) $4688
- — Z (S) $4688
1926.602 C01 VIII A
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,688 · Current $1,875 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(viii)(A):The industrial truck was not equipped with a safety platform/cage firmly secured to the lifting carriage and/or forks when used for lifting personnel: (a) Building 20 - On or about October 24, 2023, the employer used the All-Terrain forklift with a man basket on the forks to lift an employee up to work on the exterior of the wall without having the man basket//cage firmly secured exposing employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1875.2
- — C (S) $4688
- — Z (S) $4688
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347065138.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.