Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL CASTRO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL CASTRO in 14310 AVE U, LUBBOCK, TX 79423 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347066656.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Miguel Castro — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Miguel Castro is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MIGUEL CASTRO
Site address
14310 AVE U
City
LUBBOCK
State
TX
ZIP
79423
Mailing
1604 CR 7245, LUBBOCK, TX 79423
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 27, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,679 · Current $1,607 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  On or about October 23, 2023, employees were exposed to fall hazards while working on roof at heights of approximately 10 feet without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1607.4
  • — Z (S) $2679

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 27, 2023
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $226 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.  On or about October 23, 2023, employees were exposed to fall hazards due to be using a ladder that was not above 3 feet from the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $225.6
  • — Z (O) $376

View Miguel Castro's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347066656.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.