Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LINO CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LINO CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION in 77 SOUTH STREET, CONCORD, NH 03301 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347073207.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lino Construction Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lino Construction Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
77 SOUTH STREET
City
CONCORD
State
NH
ZIP
03301
Mailing
43 BEECH STREET, LOWELL, MA 01850
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)   Site- Employees were exposed to fall, scaffold collapse, and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide inspections of the worksite conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.   Site - An employee exposed to fall and scaffold collapse hazards while working from a ladder jack scaffold was not provided with scaffold training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:   Site- Employees working from the ground were not protected from over head struck by injuries where the employer did not require the wearing of head protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   Site- An employee operating pneumatic nail gun was not protected from eye injuries where the employer did not require employees to wear eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  Site - An employee working from a ladder jack scaffold was exposed to fall and scaffold collapse hazards where the employer did not provide for a competent person to inspect the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  Site - An employee working from a ladder jack scaffold was exposed to fall and scaffold collapse hazards where the employer did not provide for a competent person to erect the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.    Site- An employee accessing a ladder jack scaffold was exposed to a fall hazard where the employer did not provide a separate ladder to access the scaffold platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)  Site- An employee working from a ladder jack scaffold was not protected from a scaffold collapse hazard where the feet of the two extension ladders supporting the scaffold platform were set significantly more than one-quarter of the working length of the ladders away from the top supports.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level:(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)   Site- An employee working from a ladder jack scaffold was not protected from a scaffold collapse hazard where the two extension ladders supporting the scaffold platform were set on a pile of old shingle debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,839 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:  Site - An employee working from a ladder jack scaffold was exposed to a fall of approximately 20 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    Site- An employee working from a low sloped roof was exposed to a fall of approximately 22 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head:   Site- An employee using a personal fall arrest system while working from the roof peak was not protected from fall arresting injuries where their lanyard was connected their harness at the waist.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2024
Abate by
Mar 8, 2024
Penalty
Initial $3,457 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:   Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where a RCG material hoist was used as a ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3457

View Lino Construction Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347073207.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.