WEST BEND, WI —
OSHA Inspection: TRUCK OUTFITTERS LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TRUCK OUTFITTERS LLC in 1325 SOUTH MAIN STREET, WEST BEND, WI 53095 (NAICS 811118). OSHA activity number 347106262.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRUCK OUTFITTERS LLC
- Site address
- 1325 SOUTH MAIN STREET
- City
- WEST BEND
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53095
- Mailing
- 1325 SOUTH MAIN STREET, WEST BEND, WI 53095
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811118
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2024
- Abate by
- May 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $1,763 · Current $0 Reduced
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii):The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: (a) On or about November 15, 2023, the employer did not perform air sampling to evaluate employee(s) exposure to isocyanates during truck bed liner spraying application.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $1763
- — Z (S) $1763
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,939 · Current $1,200 Reduced
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) On or about November 15, 2023, an employee used a Honeywell air supplied full faced tight fitting respirator without receiving a medical evaluation.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1200
- — C (S) $2939
- — Z (S) $2939
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (a) On or about November 15, 2023, an employee used a Honeywell air supplied full faced tight fitting respirator without receiving a fit test.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 I01 II
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2024
- Abate by
- May 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(1)(ii): Breathing air did not meet requirements for Grade D breathing air as described in the ANSI/Compressed Gas Association Commodity Specification G-7.1-1989: (a) On or about November 15, 2023, an employee used a supplied air respirator while spraying truck bed liner without the use of Grade D breathing air.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01 VI
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2024
- Abate by
- May 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(vi): The written program did not contain procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators. (a )On or about November 15, 2023, the employer did not include procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators within the company Respiratory Protection Program.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2024
- Abate by
- May 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $1,763 · Current $700 Reduced
1073
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (a) On or about November 15, 2023, the employer had not developed and implemented a Hazard Communication/Globally Harmonized System (GHS) Program, which would address labeling and other forms of warnings on hazardous material containers, Safety Data Sheets, and employee information and training on the hazards associated with the chemicals utilized on site, and is consistent with the GHS (29 CFR 1910.1200(a)(1)). Employee(s) are exposed to chemicals associated with, but not limited to spray application of truck bed liners that contain isocyanates. The written program must also contain the following: 1. A list of all hazardous materials on site; 2. The methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine tasks involving hazardous materials, such as spills; 3. The hazards of the materials contained in piping that is not labeled, and; 4. The method the employer will use to inform other employers (contractors) of the chemicals their employees might be exposed to while performing duties at the site.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $700
- — C (S) $1763
- — Z (S) $1763
More inspections at Truck Outfitters LLC
View Truck Outfitters LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811118)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347106262.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.